Please take my survey on GMO produce

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSem1oXvAlU_kc2kOqQS4Ipw2YM9L7-yC9wk0uTHNvS2iknjPw/viewform?usp=sf_link

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Sources for Writing Analysis Paper

Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: New Animal Models https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289668/pdf/nihms-628892.pdf This is a published research article co-authored by Kevin and my research professor, Dr. Daniel Eberl. This article compares and contrasts the hearing characteristics of Drosophila and C. elegans and offers ways to use these organisms to represent noise induced hearing loss in humans. I know Kevin has written the introduction and the section about C. elegans and Dan wrote the Drosophila  section. This way, I can compare the writing styles of both researchers to show the homogeneity of writing in STEM fields. A fly's hearing https://now.uiowa.edu/2013/09/flys-hearing This is a nonacademic news article run by Iowa Now five years ago. Here the reporters interview Kevin and Dan about their recent article "Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: New Animal Models". As you read the article, you will see the writers condense the research article into a piece that i...
Read more

Leave your comments here, 1st draft of Analytical Reading

Writing Analysis: Scientific Writing in the Biological Sciences Introduction             Biology is the natural science that studies life, how other organisms interact with each other, how organisms are structured, functions, and behave.  Modern biology has become an eclectic field, from animal behavior and mechanosensation to genetics and biochemistry, there are plenty of things to write about as a researcher.  Specifically, I will be focusing on my field of interest: research genetics.  Twelve years after the Human Genome Project, researchers are hard at work discovering and documenting how the nucleic bases that code who we are affects our physic, mental pathways, even down to whether we like cilantro on our burritos or not.  I have interviewed Dr.  Kevin Christie, Post-doctoral at the Eberl Fly Lab and Assistant in Instructing at the University of Iowa, to discuss h...
Read more

Group Analysis of Sample Papers

Psychology Strengths: Interviews had good information Aside from lack of headings, the paper was organized Weaknesses: Too many quotations when they could have paraphrased Did not introduce a source, thrown it in the middle of paper Formatting: no headers, title page, lacking punctuation. Grade: D- Economics Strengths: Proper formatting Proper in-text citations Great job comparing academic and non-academic Well organized Weaknesses: Lists were wordy and had a lot of and's Did not mention an interview Lacking sub-headings to divide major headings Grade: B+ Engineering Strengths: Great use of examples, analyzed them well Compared non-academic and academic papers in same heading Good length, plenty of references Weaknesses: (Sinha, Bullock, Hendrickson, Levinson, Lyles, Radwan, Li, 2002) should be (Sinha, et al. 2002) Grade: A- Business Strengths: Best formatting: Major headers, sub-headers Very good use of examples, they explained the use of th...
Read more