IMRaD Samples

Tattoos: D-. Formatting is off, page number is not same font.
Graphs looked rushed.
Inserted author's own opinion, completely wrong for this paper.

Fast Food: D. too short, data display is inappropriate.
Weak introduction.
Repetitive word choice, not concise.

Gender terms: A The formatting looks fine, but looks different then what is taught in class (Italicized 2nd headings and all caps primary headings)
Interpretation of data is good. More research can be done on this topic.

Greeks and Geeks: A use a graph then explains the data. They need to only explain the behavior of the data.
Figure 1.1 is weird, why is there a bicolored bar?
Formatting is good, and description is good.

Social Facilitation: B not good representation of statistical data. Use mean data and make a table of exact values.
Graphs are not complete with titles, or units.
Word wise, good description and interpretation.
No conclusion.

Conformity: A- Good interpretation of statistical data and display.
needs a larger sample size
Follow up studies do not make sense

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Topic Proposal for Assignment 3

IMRaD Paper